Warning: Constant ABSPATH already defined in /home/wordsend/public_html/wp-config.php on line 29

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/wordsend/public_html/wp-config.php:29) in /home/wordsend/public_html/wp-content/plugins/wordpress-mobile-pack/inc/class-wmp-cookie.php on line 50
vika – Page 56 – Words' End

Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Andersen.

Perhaps I should take notes every time it occurs to me to blog about something; I feel as though my brain is currently missing some crucial topics that I’ve thought about putting out there in the past couple of days.

Went to see the Trilogy. That’s right, took my little not-terribly-crazy-about-LOTR-in-the-first-place self and, at a friend’s goading and offer of ticket, rode out into western Massachusetts to sit through roughly twelve hours of Movies. The following offers no spoilers, except for one possible place, where I name the topic of the third movie’s opening scene.

I have to say, I liked the experience. Had seen the first film in an airplane, and thought it a waste of three hours of my life even in an airplane – and now I know why; mostly, the appeal that Fellowship of the Ring holds for me is scenic. My goodness, but I want to go to New Zealand.

The second movie I’d been reasonably fond of before; I mean, Legolas on a medieval snowboard, what else does a girl need? It had seemed a bit fluffy, which was okay for once: I’d gone in expecting that. (Usually, I have little interest in eye candy.) Yesterday’s re-viewing confirmed that: nothing new, and not much that actively held my interest.

Return of the King was okay. The twenty million endings annoyed me a bit, not at all a good editing choice. They were each of them aesthetically appealing enough, but that isn’t justification for lumping all of them one on top of the other, with long fade-out transitions that get old quickly.

One thing I really, really did not appreciate is the Middle Eastern imagery in some of the Evil Guys’ costume choices. It’s a choice, and as costumes the black face veils and turban-like headgear looked wicked cool, but that was the only hint at The Arab World, and it was presented in a negative context, and frankly, I’m tired of the goddamn propaganda. It makes me cranky, doubly so if it’s unconscious.

Elijah Wood also seems to have little acting ability. Sure, he can do agonized okay, but kindness and wisdom are foreign concepts to his acting range. He was saccharine in places, and his relationship with Sam was more patronizing than it needed to be. (Although I liked Sean Astin’s portrayal of Sam’s relative simplemindedness, it would’ve been nice to see Sam’s wisdom and confidence grow, after all of his adventures.)

With the caveat that the furthest I got in the paper trilogy was about fifty pages into The Two Towers, I was disappointed with the turn Gollum’s character took in the third film. For all of his inner conflict, brilliantly presented in the second part of the epic, there was no clear resolution in the third. His good self did not clearly struggle to survive through to the end; and there was no clear triumph of the evil self either. Considering that the movie opens with a flashback to how Smeagol got hold of the ring, I thought they’d actually, you know, do something interesting with the character.

All of this said, though, I liked it. The photography is stunning; the soundtrack is both grand and unobtrusive; and, I admit it, the eye-candy factor is high, when it comes to the actors. I mean, Orlando Bloom. swoon.

Unrelatedly, Sir Ian McKellan is impressive as Gandalf, through and through, including both his transformation in the second film and the change over to a fierce, down-to-business attitude in the third. Cate Blanchett as Galadriel is not bad, though there were a couple of moments where she seemed to try too hard. Both Mortensen and Rhys-Davies did what they could with the roles of Aragorn and Gimli, although the post-cut material they were left to work with was rather pitifully poor (fault of the director &c.). Liv Tyler as Arwen… well, she’s as pretty and vacant as ever. Miranda Otto as Eowyn kicked all kinds of ass. Merry and Pippin were just what they needed to be, no more, no less; although I did find Pippin’s accent and naivety surprisingly endearing and not annoying. And finally, Mr. Weaving was great as Elrond but really shouldn’t have taken on two roles so major at once, both requiring him to use a non-native accent. Every once in a while, I caught glimpses of Agent Smith in his speech, and giggled.

Again to arms, and software Q

The electromyography showed no nerve damage. woot! This means that what I have is painful tendonitis, and not carpal tunnel syndrome. No surgery necessary, etc.

So, I’m checking out voice recognition software. Dragon only seems to be available for Windows, but that same company makes ViaVoice for Mac OS X. Anyone know anything good/bad about it? Or – have you heard of other OS X voice recognition software you can recommend?

link to blogrolling

Okay, so it’s not just me. In case you haven’t noticed yet either, blogrolling.com changed the pinging URL. It is:

http://rpc.blogrolling.com/pinger/

So change the preferences in your software of choice, and you should be all set.

poetry

and february was so long
that it lasted into march
and found us walking a path
alone together
you stopped and pointed
and you said, that’s a crocus
and i said, what’s a crocus
and you said, it’s a flower
i tried to remember
but i said, what’s a flower
you said, i still love you

   -dar williams

Remember spring in the winter, everyone.

More on the varied corpus.

Showed the Genette post to Nick, and was once again reminded how useful it is to get ideas out of your head and into the conversational space between you and another person. He put what I was trying to get at in simple, sharply focused terms: “…distinguish a set (bunch of texts) from a property or set of properties defining that set.”

Well, precisely. It’s important to be aware of whether a text (loosely defined) is a piece of writing or a sculpture or a piece of music. If it’s a piece of writing, there will also be circumstances in which it’s useful to know that it’s rhymed verse, or a novel, or a theatrical script.

But the very fact of this separation, this compartmentalization of artistic works is the problem. We have literature departments, and art history departments, and music departments, and we study one of these to the exclusion of the others, and of course we haven’t seen the Roland corpus as a corpus. Scholars have alluded to it, discussing for example Roland’s reception in Italy or in Spain, but what they’ve concentrated on is literary production, or word-based anyway (oral performance included). The marvelous tradition of chivalric puppet shows in southern Italy and Sicily has never really been brought into the discussion in depth, except by theatre specialists.

Anyway, the important point is: Before being included in the Roland corpus, a work of art must be checked against an eligibility list; but this list has only two criteria. It must be a text produced by humans (or human-produced machines; we’ll get to sentient animals and aliens when we get to them); and it must feature Roland as a character, major or minor. That is all. Its medium of production, form, genre and anything else about it is unimportant with regard to its inclusion (or not) in the corpus. We will not fully see the larger set of texts and the interplay of borrowing and re-imagining among them unless we discard, just for the time being, the notion of homogeneity of form.

(And is specific recording N of musical composition X a different text from the notation of said composition on paper? Depends on what your purpose is; I do not make a distinction here. Multiple recordings and/or editions of the same work are the same text unit. But a 19th-century opera treating the same subject matter as the 11th-century epic poem is a distinct text from that poem.)

EMG

On Monday, my hand doctor says, I am going to get an electromyography. She’d like to see if my forearm muscles are getting damaged enough to worry.

I’ve been trying to take care of my hands and arms, but haven’t been trying hard enough, obviously. Wake up and re-prioritize, again.

(Re-prioritizing doesn’t mean typing less; I don’t think I could cut down enough for it to matter. Working more responsibly, giving myself breaks, icing the tendons, taking Aleve, taking the time for yoga, that I could do.)

I dislike feeling physically limited. Am also deeply thankful that this is my biggest limitation.

tutoring glee.

I didn’t want to tutor today.

I really, really didn’t.

There’s thesis work to do. There’s a lot going on at other-work, too (the stuff I get paid for). I need to clean my apartment I need to iron my shoelaces I want to read the New Yorker and curl up and do nothing and sleep and traipse in the woods and stop overloading my brian and do not want to tutor.

Right. Two successful hours later, I am jumping with glee like a mad squirrel. I was made for teaching, and cannot wait to teach Italian twice a week next semester to brilliant young artists. They will undoubtedly be blasé, and some of them will care nought for homework, but it’ll be good to get some practice on non-Brown students (who are on crack in their own sweet way, hyper-responsible and sometimes more demanding on the teacher than the teacher is on them). Plus, RISD exposure specifically is never a bad thing. And, teaching! I get to create knowledge and get them to speak another language. How good is that?!

grr argh, blogrolling!

I’ve got MovableType pinging blogrolling.com every time I update, and for the last several days that ping has returned an error (the activity log just says “failed”). Anyone else have this problem?

MLA session change

I am pleased to announce an addition to ACH-sponsored session “Electronic Theory and Criticism” at this year’s MLA convention in San Diego. Thom Swiss, of University of Iowa, has graciously agreed to be a respondent to the papers. The full details of the session are below; we hope to see you there!

Please pass this information on to people you think may be interested.

Saturday, 27 December
8. Electronic Theory and Criticism

3:30-4:45 p.m., Cunningham A, Manchester Grand Hyatt

Program arranged by the Association for Computers and the Humanities.
Presiding: Vika Zafrin, Brown Univ.

1. “Show, Not Tell: The Value of New Media Scholarship,” Cheryl E. Ball, Michigan Technological Univ.

2. “The Simultaneous South: An Electronic, Multilinear Approach to Borges’s ‘The South,'” Marjorie Luesebrink, Irvine Valley Coll., CA

Respondent: Thomas Swiss, Univ. of Iowa.

css.php